Smith Law
Northern California: 415-520-6950
Southern California: 310-806-9560
    
SMITH
PATTEN
SMITH PATTEN is a professional corporation formed by experienced San Francisco trial attorneys as an employment law and business litigation boutique. Founding attorneys Spencer Smith and Dow Patten have tried cases in State and Federal Courts in California and throughout the United States.
When faced with an adverse employment action, such as termination, harassment, or being passed over for a promotion, it is important to seek legal
counsel immediately. We will provide you with a candid assessment of your situation and your options. Often we are able to negotiate a resolution to your situation prior to any complaints being filed in court or with administrative agencies. If litigation is necessary, we will represent you aggressively and vigorously. In addition to handling cases on behalf of individuals, we also handle multi-plaintiff and employment class actions.

In forming SMITH PATTEN, they assembled a team of lawyers that offer clients the best of both worlds: big firm legal talent with small firm flexibility and innovation.

When faced with an adverse employment action, such as termination, harassment, or being passed over for a promotion, it is important to seek legal counsel immediately. We will provide you with a candid assessment of your situation and your options. Often we are able to negotiate a resolution to your situation prior to any complaints being filed in court or with administrative agencies. If litigation is necessary, we will represent you aggressively and vigorously. In addition to handling cases on behalf of individuals, we also handle multi-plaintiff and employment class actions.

Contact Us

 

Latest News

PG&E ordered to turn over whistleblower's
hard drive
Law Offices of Spencer Smith selected for re-trial of $2,450,000 punitive damage award in Boswell v. FedEx. Mediation is Scheduled for January 11, 2012.

Brown v. FPI Mgmt, et al: Opposition to Motion Requesting That Plaintiff Be Required to Plead Discrimination With Specificity
Lam v. CCSF: Reply to Motion for Sanctions Against City Attorney Rafal Ofierski for violating Court Protective Order
Willis v. CCSF, Theresa Sparks, et al.: First Ever Reverse Sexual Orientation Discrimination Case Filed Against A Municipality.
The Law Offices Of Spencer Smith Selected To Argue The Return of $975,000 Race Discrimination Verdict

Case Updates

Molex v. MUNI
Brown v. FPI Management, Inc.
Hoze v. FPI Management, Inc.
Evans v. FedEx

Latest Results

Perkins v. SMUD
Tinsley v. PG&E
Paul v. PG&E
Favorable Settlement in Multi-Plaintiff
Confidential Executive
Spears v. Contra Costa County
Khristina Hunter v. California